« and now a word from Oliver Wendell Holmes... |
| KiRKWOOD »
Posted on March 11, 2011 12:09 AM
Unseen in this illustration is a submerged giant anchor about 10 times the size of the boat that says "Political Inconsistency & Lack of Discipline"--& then the media has a millstone about 10 times the size of that anchor they'll tie around his neck the moment he announces his candidacy.
I don't think it's going to happen, but considering the abysmal pool of Republican candidates, if he's going to run, he'd better make it 2012 (unless he's planning to transfer his war chest to Callista).
March 11, 2011 1:05 AM
March 11, 2011 01:05
When all is said and done, conservative candidates are dissected using a jewelers loop. Liberals are afforded a blindfolded judge.
March 11, 2011 10:11 AM
March 11, 2011 10:11
I like Newt and think he is probably the smartest person in the Washington whirlpool. Unfortunately, he is too brash for some people's sensitivities.
An T, you're right; he has shown some inconsistencies.
Tom Wms. |
March 11, 2011 11:57 AM
March 11, 2011 11:57
An inconsistent Newt is better than a consistent Obama.
March 11, 2011 1:47 PM
March 11, 2011 13:47
Amen to Doug. An inconsistent third grader on ritalin would be better than B.O.
Tom Wms. |
March 11, 2011 3:02 PM
March 11, 2011 15:02
To paraphrase Churchill, I won't be voting "for" any Republican in 2012. I'll be voting against Barack Obama...
... and I think I'd vote against Obama if the Republicans gave the nomination to Alvin Greene.
What worries me are wet-behind-the-ears young voters & "independents" (the people smart enough to know Liberalism is a sham, but are brimming with so much ingrained Leftist indoctrination they're grossly misguided) & there are enough of the two of them to swing it Obama's way if the Republicans can't come up with a charmer that can equal BHO's perceived charisma (that he keeps an approval rating in the 40s sickens me at the thought of my fellow countrymen).
I'd certainly prefer Newt, but I don't think he stands a snowball's chance of carrying the "middle".
March 12, 2011 2:10 AM
March 12, 2011 02:10
I should have said "W. C. Fields", not "Churchill". I'm familiar with the quote, & I should have known better.
In my [lame] defense, they were both rummies, they both liked their stogies, & they did favor each other.
March 26, 2011 11:58 PM
March 26, 2011 23:58
Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
watch movies online for free without downloading anything |
April 4, 2011 4:25 AM
April 4, 2011 04:25
Thank you for sharing with us, I believe this website really stands out : D.
seo services delhi |
April 5, 2011 6:01 PM
April 5, 2011 18:01
Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it's rare to see a nice blog like this one these days.. :)
Buy Backlinks |
April 9, 2011 8:21 AM
April 9, 2011 08:21
John Cox is a painter, cartoonist, and illustrator for hire. For information about purchasing existing work or commissioning new work, contact him by e-mail at john555cox [at] hotmail.com.
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 11, 2011 12:09 AM.
The previous post in this blog was and now a word from Oliver Wendell Holmes....
The next post in this blog is KiRKWOOD.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.