John Cox is a painter, cartoonist, and illustrator for hire. For information about purchasing existing work or commissioning new work, contact him by e-mail at john555cox [at] hotmail.com.
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 23, 2012 5:34 PM.
The previous post in this blog was LP Cover Illustration Idea.
The next post in this blog is Quiptoons.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (7)
Barack not interrupt? Now you're just being plain silly.
Posted by Terwiliger | October 23, 2012 10:28 PM
Posted on October 23, 2012 22:28
That's "pissy" not "pithy".
Posted by Dr. Bob | October 23, 2012 11:48 PM
Posted on October 23, 2012 23:48
Fortunately, the debate didn't get so far that the lines in the drawing weren't sarcastic.
Posted by Dr. Bob | October 23, 2012 11:50 PM
Posted on October 23, 2012 23:50
Deference is overrated when it comes to people with their pants ablaze.
The problem is that they both say the other is lying, which causes a cognitive short circuit. I'd like to see the debates occur online in written form over the course of a week so they don't go unchallenged on the facts.
I also can't quite tell if women actually want to see more deference, or if they are just saying that and they'll actually go home with the snidest bastage.
Posted by Zeroth | October 24, 2012 1:58 AM
Posted on October 24, 2012 01:58
You gotta admit, it's better than "Dancing With The Stars".
Posted by Tom Wms. | October 24, 2012 7:56 AM
Posted on October 24, 2012 07:56
My idea of a debate would be to put both candidates in a booth. Nearby would be about 20 truly "independent" evaluators who give more then a passing glance at what goes on in Washington. When the candidate makes a false statement, he gets an electric shock. They make a statement of absolutely no substance, they get a cold shower. They tell a half-truth, the booth fills with fog. They spout platitudes, they're engulfed in bovine excrement.
Naturally, this would be "pay for view" and there would be at least 5 debates. Not only would people pay to watch, all the money collected would go to retiring the national debt.
Who knows, 4 or 5 presidential cycles, we'd be free and clear without raising taxes!
Posted by GarandFan | October 24, 2012 10:05 AM
Posted on October 24, 2012 10:05
How about a debate that's a refereed debate with a real moderator--not a tag-team of a Democrat + a Lefist media stooge vs. a Republican.
Posted by Anonymous | October 24, 2012 12:56 PM
Posted on October 24, 2012 12:56